Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ofek Shimanov vs Congsup Congcar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimanov vs Congcar analysis and find out who is favored!
Ofek Shimanov vs Congsup Congcar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimanov has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Congcar has won 50.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimanov, in recent form, has won 52.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Congcar has won 43.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.14% and 20.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimanov has saved 54.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Congcar has saved 51.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimanov has won 53.49% of matches played (W/L 23/ 20), with Congcar winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimanov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28). Congcar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 119/ 156), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimanov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Congcar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimanov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shimanov winning 2 and Congcar winning 0. The last match between Shimanov and Congcar was at the M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat, 26-02-2024, Q3, Hard with Ofek Shimanov getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimanov and Congcar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shimanov winning 0 times and Congcar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimanov winning 0, and Congcar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimanov has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.12 while Congcar has played against players with an average rank of 42.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimanov has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Congcar has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimanov has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Congcar has converted 29.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimanov 1 - 0 Congcar
823
Rank
822
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
53% (31-28)
Career Total W/L
43% (120-159)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ofek Shimanov | Congsup Congcar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (35/58) | 64% (43/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 51% (22/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (15/23) | 54% (13/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (32/67) | 31% (18/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Congsup Congcar
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ofek Shimanov | Congsup Congcar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (22/22) | 20% (2/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (210/209) | 39% (37/58) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (9/10) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:28 | 1:22:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 149.47 | 83 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (655/1080) | 66% (188/287) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (425/655) | 60% (112/188) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (216/425) | 51% (50/99) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (44/130) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (452/1156) | 29% (82/278) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (9/10) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Ofek Shimanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Ofek Shimanov
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Ofek Shimanov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Ofek Shimanov
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Aaron Cohen
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Ofek Shimanov
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Alexander Frusina
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Boris Pokotilov
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Congsup Congcar
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Alberto Lim
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Congsup Congcar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Congsup Congcar
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Brosset
Player
Congsup Congcar
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Congsup Congcar
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Congsup Congcar
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Congsup Congcar
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Cade Birrell
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Dharmil Shah
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Ivan Panin
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pengyu Lu
Player
Congsup Congcar
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimanov Vs Congcar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
